describe various leadership styles based on the use of authority: How Using Different Types of Authority Affects Leadership

The Democratic Leader is still the one making the final decision or approving the decision of the team. The phrase most illustrative of a Democratic Leadership style is “All for one and one for all”. A Democratic Leadership style gets people to do what you want to be done but in a way that they want to do it.

Laissez-faire leaders put a great amount of faith in the individual. They trust them to remain self-motivated, on-task, and accountable. If issues arise, these leaders are available to offer direction, but only upon request.

Democratic leadership gives you a range of ideas to choose from, and a team to consult when making your decision. The ability to make decisive, crucial calls is the key trait of an autocratic leader. Autocratic leaders aren’t always well liked, but sometimes an autocratic leader is what the job requires.

Cross-Cultural Leadership

Sales Performance Transform your business, starting with your sales leaders. Diversity & Inclusion Foster a culture of inclusion and belonging. Thoughtful attention to needs of people leads to a friendly and comfortable organisational atmosphere and work tempo.

Although leadership styles can differ, Balian Allen says there are certain universal skills that most effective leaders share which aspiring leaders should strive to develop. Although there’s no one-size-fits-all leadership style, there are some tried and true methodologies that have worked for some of today’s most effective leaders. Learn more about five common leadership styles and how you can make them your own.

At present, the worker’s participation in describe various leadership styles based on the use of authority is gaining popularity. New ideas or creative ideas of the followers will not have a scope to be applied and benefits of these could not be obtained under autocratic style. Under negative style, everybody tries to shift his responsibility over to others. It may not provide positive result when subordinates prefer minimum interaction with the leader.

• A leadership style refers to a leader’s methods, characteristics, and behaviors when directing, motivating, and managing their teams.
• The strategic leader fills the gap between the need for new possibility and the need for practicality by providing a prescriptive set of habits.
• One example of a cross-cultural leader in sports is quarterback and Heisman Trophy winner Mariota Marcus.

The person structures the complete situation for the employees and they do what they are told. Here, the leadership may be negative because followers are uninformed, insecure and afraid of the leader’s authority. This is also known as participative leadership style or group centred leadership style.

Leadership and authority

The organization is paralyzed when the leader isn’t present, as the entire organization is dependent on the leader for instructions. Instead of micro-managing your team, create a safe space for effective 1-on-1 conversations. It’s generally recommended to avoid using this style altogether unless it is in a state of emergency when you need to quickly make decisions, even if they are unpopular. It’s equally important to recognize individuals and the collective team. When employees feel valued, they are more likely to contribute and build meaningful connections.

They encourage and develop positive working relationships between often diverse and conflicting groups and motivate individuals by supporting them during highly monotonous or stressful times. Unfortunately the literature on leadership is expansive, with various theories competing for dominance, so there is not a definitive answer to this question. There is overlap between some of the main leadership writers and theorists, with certain leadership styles common to all.

What are the different types of leadership styles in management and business?

A danger of the democratic leadership style is that the leader can become overly dependent on the group or hidden within the group, allowing the group to make the decisions. This can result in decisions being made which drift the organization towards its strategic goal rather than rapidly and purposely moving towards its goal. The autocratic type of leadership style can be very retrogressive as it fuels employee disgruntlement since most decisions would not be in the employees’ interests. An example can be a unilateral increase in working hours or a change in other working conditions unfavorable to employees but made by leadership to increase production. Without employee consultation, the manager may not be fully aware of why production is not increasing, thereby resorting to a forced increase in working hours. It can lead to persistent absenteeism and high employee turnover.

1-9 style says that a leader should give maximum attention to people and less effort for production to have healthy and friendly organisation which can achieve its goals. This also means that production process is sound enough in that situation to have a sustainable growth. Michigan University of USA, also conducted one study on general behaviour pattern of a leader under the leadership of Rennis Likert and the study is known as “Likert’s System”. The study team conducted interviews with leaders/managers and subordinates and arrived at behavioural patterns, viz., job-centered behaviour, and employee-centred behaviour.

Example of a delegative leader

We rely on the most current and reputable sources, which are cited in the text and listed at the bottom of each article. Content is fact checked after it has been edited and before publication. This 5-week course will teach you everything you need to know to set up and then scale a small, part-time business that will be profitable regardless of what’s happening in the economy. Another point to note from this diagram is that the abilities of the leader, both in terms of soft and hard skills, must increase as we move from box 1 to 4. Use with creative professionals who have solid skills and lots of experience in their jobs. Self-organizing teams without oversight or direction are prone to miss deadlines.

This is parallel to the authoritarian concept of leadership behaviour. Power orientation approach of leadership styles is based on the degree of authority which a leader uses in influencing the behaviour of his/her subordinates. As in case of OSU and Likert’s Studies, grid is developed on the attitudes of a leader. Two attitudinal variables which act as premise for managerial grid are – concern for people and concern for production. These two variables are projected on 1 to 9 point scale horizontally and vertically.

This authority is often bestowed upon individuals based on legal and regulatory criteria. It can be taken away once they have left their positions of power. In the past, legal authority systems have often developed in opposition to traditional authority. Charismatic authority comes from the personal charisma, strength, and charm of an individual’s personality.

Those who follow a laissez-faire leadership style are the complete opposite of micromanagers. They take a hands-off approach to managing their team, giving members support when needed but not overseeing every detail. These leaders leave decisions, task management, and project execution up to each individual; however, they are still held accountable for their team. Unlike other leadership styles, transformational leadership is all about initiating change in organizations, groups, oneself and others.

https://1investing.in/ leaders tend to make followers feel like they are an important part of the team, which helps foster commitment to the goals of the group. Unless the leader keeps pace with new trends as time goes on, new opportunities could be missed. Additionally, the lack of flexibility in autocratic leadership doesn’t lend itself to planning for long-term initiatives. Charismatic leaders tend to hold power for short periods of time, and according to Weber, they are just as likely to be tyrannical as they are heroic. Diverse male leaders such as Hitler, Napoleon, Jesus Christ, César Chávez, Malcolm X, and Winston Churchill are all considered charismatic leaders.

Expert authority

Through real-world lessons, you can build and strengthen your leadership capabilities. Being an effective leader isn’t just about your own actions, however. That’s why it’s important for leaders to embody these additional qualities, no matter the leadership style you choose.